#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Prenatal dia­gnosis of parasitic conjoined twins


Prenatálna diagnostika parazitických zrastených dvojčiat

Heteropágy alebo parazitické zrastené dvojčatá predstavujú extrémne zriedkavú anomáliu, ktorá sa vyskytuje približne v 1 z 1 milióna prípadov. Sú charakterizované prítomnosťou parazitického dvojčaťa s významnou vrodenou abnormalitou, pripojeného k zvyčajne inak zdravému plodu. Dobre vyvinuté dvojča je známe ako „autosite“ alebo „hostiteľ“, zatiaľ čo ťažko postihnutý plod sa nazýva „parazit“. Prežitie defektného dvojčaťa závisí od kardiovaskulárneho systému druhého, relatívne normálneho plodu. Predstavujeme prípad 27-ročnej primigravidy v 14. týždni gravidity s ultrazvukovým nálezom poukazujúcim na parazitické zrastené dvojčatá, omfalopágy.

Klíčová slova:

prenatálna diagnostika – zrastené dvojčatá – parazitické dvojčatá – heteropágy


Authors: Petra Gašparová ;  Zuzana Ballová ;  Martina Sitáš ;  Erik Dosedla
Authors‘ workplace: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Šafarik University and Hospital AGEL Košice-Šaca Inc., Košice-Šaca
Published in: Ceska Gynekol 2025; 90(1): 44-47
Category: Case Report
doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg202544

Overview

Heteropagus or parasitic conjoined twins represent an extremely rare anomaly, occurring in approximately 1 in 1 million cases. This condition is characterized by the presence of a parasitic twin with significant congenital abnormalities attached to an otherwise typically healthy fetus. The well-developed twin is known as the “autosite” or “host,” while the severely affected fetus is termed the “parasite.” Survival of the defective twin depends on the cardiovascular system of the second, relatively normal fetus. We present the case of a 27-year-old primigravida in her 14th week of pregnancy with ultrasound findings indicating parasitic conjoined twins, specifically omphalopagus.

Keywords:

prenatal diagnosis – conjoined twins – parasitic twins – heteropagus

Introduction

Heteropagus or parasitic conjoined twins are a highly uncommon anomaly with an estimated incidence of less than 0.1 in 100,000 births. Among all instances of conjoined twins, the incidence can range from 4.5% to 15% [1]. The earliest reliable report of this phenomenon likely dates back to the 16th century by the French surgeon Ambroise Paré, who described an acephalous body attached to the abdomen in one of his patients [2].

This anomaly is characterized by a parasitic twin with significant congenital abnormalities joined to an otherwise relatively normal fetus. Heteropagus twins are connected at one of the shared points, similar to intact conjoined twins. They often have externally attached supernumerary limbs, sometimes with some viscera, and rarely a functional brain or heart. The well-developed twin is referred to as the “autosite” or “host,” and the critically defective fetus is referred to as the “parasite.” Tissues of the severely defective twin depend on the cardiovascular system of the second, relatively normal fetus for survival [2–4].

Parasitic conjoined twins arise when monozygotic twins do not separate completely, resulting in the dominance of one embryo‘s development over the other [5]. The asymmetry between the autosite and parasite likely occurs due to vascular compromise, causing the parasite‘s tissue to rely on collaterals from the autosite. This leads to selective ischemic atrophy in the deprived portion of the parasite‘s body [6]. Sonographic examination plays a crucial role in prenatal diagnosis [7].

1. High-defi nition three-dimensional ultrasound image at 14th weeks of gestation showing parasitic conjoined twins (omphalopagus), with the extrafetal body (parasite) attached above the umbilical cord insertion, displaying an omphalocele of the autosite.
High-defi nition three-dimensional ultrasound image at 14th weeks of gestation showing parasitic conjoined twins (omphalopagus), with the extrafetal body (parasite) attached above the umbilical cord insertion, displaying an omphalocele of the autosite.
Obr. 1. Trojrozmerný ultrazvukový obraz s vysokým rozlíšením v 14. týždni tehotenstva znázorňuje parazitické zrastené dvojčatá (omfalopágy) s extrafetálnou časťou (parazitom) pripojenou nad inzerciou pupočníka, zobrazuje omfalokélu autosite.

2. Mode with color fl ow mapping ultrasound image at 14th weeks of gestation showing a parasitic fetus connected at the midline to the anterior abdominal wall of the autosite through soft tissue with weak vascularization. The soft tissue of the umbilical cord contained a total of fi ve vessels – three in the umbilical cord of the autosite and two in the umbilical cord of the parasite.
Mode with color fl ow mapping ultrasound image at 14th weeks of gestation showing a parasitic fetus connected at the midline to the anterior abdominal wall of the autosite through soft tissue with weak vascularization. The soft tissue of the umbilical cord contained a total of fi ve vessels – three in the umbilical cord of the autosite and two in the umbilical cord of the parasite.
Obr. 2. Ultrazvukový obraz s farebným mapovaním toku v 14. týždni tehotenstva zobrazuje parazitický plod spojený v stredovej línii s prednou brušnou stenou hostiteľa mäkkým tkanivom so slabou vaskularizáciou. Mäkké tkanivo pupočníka obsahovalo celkovo päť ciev – tri v pupočníku hostiteľa a dve v pupočníku parazita.

Case report

A 27-year-old primigravida was referred to our department for an ultrasound examination during her 14th week of pregnancy. Her family and personal medical history were unremarkable, and the pregnancy occurred after spontaneous conception. She had not taken any medications or been exposed to teratogens, and all serological tests, including those for toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen, and Treponema pallidum hemagglutination, had negative results.

During the ultrasound examination, conducted with a Voluson E10 system (GE Medical Systems Milwaukee, WI) using a convex 4–8 MHz abdominal transducer (RAB 4–8 L), bifetal gravidity was identified, complicated by parasitic conjoined twins. The crown-rump length of the first fetus was 86 mm, corresponding to 14 weeks and 4 days of pregnancy. A dominant omphalocele measuring 10 × 9 mm was present. The second twin, a parasitic fetus, was an acardiac and acranius conjoined above the navel in the epigastrium and distal part of the chest with the first fetus in the umbilical area, resulting in an omphalopagus conjoined twin (Fig. 1). This connection occurred through soft tissue with diminished vascular support. The fetuses had a total of five vessels in the soft umbilical cord tissue – three in the umbilical cord of the autosite and two in the parasite (Fig. 2).

The patient was informed about the unfavorable prognosis and requested a termination of the pregnancy. Termination was performed through ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation, using a combination of forceps and aspiration under general anesthesia. Aborted tissues were sent in for histological examination, confirming the presence of five vessels in the umbilical cord samples, with no other significant findings.

 

Discussion

Conjoined twins are characterized by the region of their conjoined bodies, resulting from incomplete monozygotic twinning. Their development reveals a duplication anomaly believed to stem from the conception of a single zygote, likely arising from the splitting and incomplete separation of the inner cell mass within 3–15 days after fertilization. This anomaly might also arise from the fusion of two distinct embryonic discs [8].

Conjoined twins can be symmetrical (diplopagus) or asymmetrical. Symmetrical conjoined twins are approximately equal in size and joined symmetrically, while asymmetrical conjoined twins involve one nearly normal twin (autosite) and an incomplete twin (parasite), fully dependent on the autosite for growth [9]. Conjoined twins are classified based on the most prominent site of union, such as cephalopagus (head), thoracopagus (thorax), omphalopagus (abdomen), ischiopagus (pelvis), parapagus (side), craniopagus (cranium), pygopagus (sacrum), or rachipagus (spine, back) [10].

Death of the parasitic twin during embryonic development results in the autosite retaining vascularized body parts in the heteropagus twin. The exact cause of embryonic death is unknown, but may involve ischemic atrophy, insufficient cardiac function of the parasite, or vascular steal from the autosite. The parasitic twin typically lacks a heart, receiving blood supply from vessels originating in various regions of the autosite, such as the liver, epigastric artery, umbilical vessels, or falciform ligament [11].

Fetiform masses may also be located within the body of the autosite or protrude from the mouth, known as fetus in fetu (endoparasitic twin). The heart and brain are typically vestigial or entirely absent, similar to cases of external parasitic twins [4].

Autosite twins often have congenital cardiac malformations, potentially caused by hemodynamic changes associated with supporting the parasitic twin [11]. Omphalocele is also common in the autosite [12]. Prenatal ultrasound is crucial for diagnosing conjoined twins, with possible confirmation as early as the 12th week. By the 20th week, prenatal ultrasonography can provide detailed anatomical information [13].

Postnatal diagnosis is complemented by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging to offer a comprehensive view of blood circulation and type of connection, contributing to enhanced surgical success rates and reduced postoperative complications. Cesarean delivery is recommended to prevent complications during childbirth and reduce the risk of birth injury due to frequent occurrence of a large parasite with an anomalous shape [14].

Surgical separation poses significant challenges and requires a multidisciplinary team. Optimal timing for surgical separation varies, with elective procedures recommended for infants between 9 and 12 months old. Early separation might be required in emergent conditions such as congestive cardiac failure, respiratory distress, intestinal obstruction, gastroschisis, and obstructive uropathy [13]. Preferred treatment is complete excision, although surgical challenges depend on the location [7]. Survival rates are generally favorable in heteropagus twins due to less extensive vascular and visceral connections between the autosite and parasite compared to symmetric conjoined twins [2].

 

Conclusion

Parasitic conjoined twins represent an uncommon anomaly of monochorionic, monoamniotic twins. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis is crucial for identifying this anomaly, which can be established as early as the 1st trimester. Three-dimensional ultrasound provides deeper insights into parasitic twins, offering a clearer view and improved understanding of how their fetal parts are arranged spatially.


Sources

1. Muhelo AR, Montemezzo G, Da Dalt L et al. Successful management of a parasitic ischiopagus conjoined twins in a low-income setting. Clin Case Rep 2018; 6 (2): 385–390. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1374.

2. Sharma G, Mobin SS, Lypka M et al. Heteropagus (parasitic) twins: a review. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (12): 2454–2463. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg. 2010.07.002.

3. Takrouney MH, Ibrahim IA, Abdel-Ghaffar HS et al. Conjoined twins: a report of four cases. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 73: 289–293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.06.072.

4. Spencer R. Parasitic conjoined twins: external, internal (fetuses in fetu and teratomas), and detached (acardiacs). Clin Anat 2001; 14 (6): 428–444. doi: 10.1002/ca.1079.

5. Stahr N, Guggenberger R, Kellenberger CJ et al. In utero and postnatal imaging findings of parasitic conjoined twins (ischiopagus parasiticus tetrapus). Pediatr Radiol 2015; 45 (5): 767–770. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-3172-0.

6. Menon P, Solanki S, Samujh R et al. External and internal parasitic conjoined twinning: diverse presentation and different surgical challenges. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2022; 19 (4): 223–227. doi: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_78_21.

7. Pang H, Zang J, Qiu L. Prenatal diagnosis of parasitic conjoined twins using three-dimensional ultrasound: a case report. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 148 (2): 265–266. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13017.

8. Gedikbaşı A, Yıldırım G, Saygılı S et al. Prenatal diagnosis of conjoined twins: four cases in a prenatal center. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2010; 11 (4): 174–177. doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2010.32.

9. Abubakar AM, Ahidjo A, Chinda JY et al. The epigastric heteropagus conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg 2011; 46 (2): 417–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.09.045.

10. Spencer R. Anatomic description of conjoined twins: a plea for standardized terminology. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31 (7): 941–944. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468 (96) 90417-0.

11. Ozkan-Ulu H, Yilmaz Y, Sari FN et al. An unusual case of heteropagus: autosite with a complex cardiac malformation. Pediatr Neonatol 2011; 52 (6): 358–360. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.08.011.

12. Ahmed K, Mahdi BD, Hayet Z et al. Thoracic heteropagus conjoined twins associated to an omphalocele: report of a case and complete review of the literature. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2016; 13 (4): 209–212. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725. 194670.

13. Baskaran D, Aleem MA, Ravi R. Parasitic twin with gastroschisis is one of the rarest variant of conjoined twins: a case report. Indian J Surg 2015; 77 (Suppl 1): 90–911. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1165-8.

14. Zhu W, Cui X, Wu Z et al. Case report: epigastric heteropagus twins and literature review. Front Pediatr 2023; 11: 1088480. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1088480.

ORCID of authors

P. Gašparová 0000-0002-6354-6911

Z. Ballová 0000-0002-0605-948X

M. Sitáš 0000-0002-7273-1051

E. Dosedla 0000-0001-8319-9008

Submitted/Doručené: 10. 9. 2024

Accepted/Prijaté: 10. 10. 2024

Assoc. Prof. Erik Dosedla, MD, PhD, MBA

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

Faculty of Medicine

Pavol Jozef Safarik University

Hospital AGEL Košice-Šaca Inc.

Lúčna 57

040 15 Košice-Šaca

Slovak Republic

erik.dosedla@nke.agel.sk

Labels
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicine

Article was published in

Czech Gynaecology


Most read in this issue
Login
Forgotten password

Enter the email address that you registered with. We will send you instructions on how to set a new password.

Login

Don‘t have an account?  Create new account

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#